Sex and the City: Prop K
November 26, 2008 by Josef Bautista, Contributing Writer · Leave a Comment
Memo: Prop K did not pass on Election Day. For those hoping and praying for victory, San Franciscans, as liberal as they are, voted against decriminalized prostitution. Prop K, heavily supported by the San Francisco Democratic Party, the National Lawyers Guild, the Harvey Milk Democratic Club, along with many other prominent progressive organizations, would forbid law enforcement agencies to investigate, arrest, or prosecute anyone selling sex, although it would not technically legalize it. To the keen visitor, San Francisco seems like a city full of prestige, ingenuity, and rich in culture. However, when you venture into the heart of the city, visitors will find that it is teeming with dirty vices. Brothels posing as massage parlors and nail salons, narcotics being sold on the corner in broad daylight, and strip clubs innocently waiting for the tired traveler. If you haven’t been to San Francisco for a while, there is much here to suit your pleasure: It is a perfect city for the undiscriminating John.
San Francisco, the flash-forward city of the Pacific Rim, has, for better or worse, become an extremely liberal city. It has become a home to the Folsom Street Parade that celebrates sadism and masochism, Lovefest–a street festival where neo-hippies gather to share “love,” and a Hollywood mayor who regards his town as a “sanctuary” for illegal immigrants, a haven for those practicing civil disobedience. Prostitutes, coincidentally, have had a long, famed history in San Francisco, setting up shop on Maiden Lane (a.k.a. Morton Lane) near Union Square during the Gold Rush, then accommodating miners with women of all colors. Today, Maiden Lane only exists as an alley for delivery vehicles and upscale boutiques. However, the elusive “call girls” have migrated to the online world. Through this transition, escorts now have access to a more seemingly infinite database than they could ever encounter on the streets and some who they would never imagine soliciting business from. John’s or “tricks,” one who uses an escort’s service, can now safely view and pick their fantasy in the privacy of their home without the authorities breathing down their neck. The internet has also given escorts anonymity and has provided them with forums to share their positive experiences, fears, and business information. Prostitution in the 21st century has become a billion dollar business.
Prostitution is the world’s oldest profession. And there is nothing anyone can do from preventing a women from selling her body. Unfortunately, in the modern age, many other despicable trades are associated with it such as pimping, pandering, human trafficking, and child prostitution which have slandered the honest working girl. To which I am happy that Prop. K did not pass. Though Prop K’s intent was to protect women and to report abuse without fear of prosecution, it allows pimps to operate legally, opening the floodgates to legal organized crime, threatening the humanity of women. Whether one thinks prostitution should be legalized or not, one cannot deny the fact that prostitution breads a slew of detrimental activities that ultimately harm society.
A Lesson From Canada
October 24, 2008 by Kevin Van Dyke, Editor · 2 Comments
An Economist.com article entitled The Conservatives by a bigger head notes that a fragmented Canada gave Stephen Harper another term as Conservative Prime Minister when his party won the October 2008 federal election, achieving a bit more strength in a minority government. While the Conservatives increased their share of the popular vote by little more than a percentage point to 37.6%, this will likely only be translated into about 19 more seats.
Harper and the Conservatives did solidify their western base of Alberta oilmen and Saskatchewan farmers, and picked up seats in suburban Ontario and the Maritime provinces. However, Harper failed to increase his party’s ten seats in Quebec. For the most part in Quebec, the separatist Bloc Québécois blocked any Conservative advance, even though independence never surfaced as an issue during the campaign.
However, more than the Conservatives failing to get a majority, the main lesson to come out of the Canadian election is that Liberals were the ones that really lost it. Their share of the popular vote fell to 26%, their lowest since 1867. The Liberal leader, Stéphane Dion, a Quebecker, chose to fight the election on a bold plan for a carbon tax just when voters began to worry about the economy. (It didn’t help that Dion is not a good communicator in English.)
A broader lesson from the Canadian election is that a candidate should not impose a tax on all citizens, particularly on the middle class, when the economy is slowing. This is a lesson the McCain campaign has ignored with its proposed tax on employees for the value of employer-paid health care benefits. This tax has been one of Obama’s most effective campaign attacks and the focus of his prime literature drops over the past few weeks.
Supreme Court 1.0
September 25, 2008 by Mark Wilson, Editor · Leave a Comment
While The New York Times Magazine philosophizes about the importance of U.S. Supreme Court decisions vis-a-vis international law, the reality is that the international community is increasingly shying away from citing decisions from our supreme court.
Here’s a fact: the U.S. Supreme Court has moved further right over the last eight years, with the loss of Sandra Day O’Connor and the appointment of both John Roberts and Samuel Alito. Here’s another fact: other courts around the world use each other’s opinions, but the United States is loathe to do so. As the rest of the world becomes more liberal, the United States becomes more conservative and the court that used to lead the world in constitutional law is now being self-relegated to anachronism.









