Sri Lanka: Winning the War, But What About the Peace?
by James Mutti, Contributing Editor
May 22, 2009
A dozen years ago, while in India, I became intrigued by the civil war raging in Sri Lanka. Encouraged by my Sri Lankan meditation teacher and an Australian Buddhist monk who had resided for years in Sri Lanka, I planned a research trip to the small tropical island nation. With a book full of good contacts and a head full of warnings about being careful what I ask, how I ask it, and who I ask it of, I eagerly prepared for my trip. But just two weeks before my departure, Tamil rebels detonated a series of bombs in the Sri Lankan capital, and I was advised to cancel my trip. I wavered, but the monk’s argument won me over. Who wanted to be worried about being killed every time they got on a bus or went to the market or left their hotel room? Reluctantly, I canceled the trip, but over the years continued to follow developments there.
This week, the Sri Lankan military has finally defeated the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) after over 30 years of armed conflict, killing the LTTE’s leader Vellupillai Prabhakaran and wiping out most of the LTTE leadership. In the early 1980s the LTTE emerged as the strongest and most ruthless of the Tamil separatist groups, upset with the discrimination and violence directed against the island’s Tamil-speaking Hindu minority by the Sinhala-speaking Buddhist majority. Sri Lanka’s Buddhist clergy rabidly supported the war despite its high cost, heavy civilian casualties, and questionable effectiveness. The LTTE (and other armed and unarmed Tamil groups), fighting for a Tamil homeland in the north and east of Sri Lanka, was supported from abroad and from the southern Indian state of Tamil Nadu despite being labeled a terrorist organization by the US and other nations. For decades the conflict dragged on without an end in sight, and was presumed to be unwinnable by either side. Up to 100,000 people died. But in the last few years, Sri Lanka’s government launched an all-out assault on the LTTE, and the LTTE was split by infighting. The Sri Lankan military’s final push in the last few weeks precipitated a humanitarian crisis in which hundreds of thousands of terrified Tamil civilians were caught in the crossfire between the Sri Lankan military and the LTTE, and 7,000 were killed. But Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa won his war.
Now that the Sri Lankan military has emerged victorious, it remains to be seen how well the government secures the peace. The struggle for a Tamil homeland has perhaps been dealt a final blow and Sri Lankans are undoubtedly weary of war. But if, in the wake of the war, the Sri Lankan government treats Tamils as conquered subjects and fails to address the conflict’s root causes, resistance may again grow. This week’s national holiday celebrating the government’s victory over the LTTE must have seemed like insensitive gloating to many of the country’s Tamils, and it makes one wonder if the Sri Lankan government truly grasps what needs to happen next.
The challenge facing the Sri Lankan government is complex and substantial – to heal the wounds inflicted over the past three decades of war, to substantively address Tamil grievances against the Sri Lankan government, and to build a new inclusive Sri Lankan state and society. Can a government that has been on a war footing for so long accomplish these delicate tasks? Can a government that has for so long demonized, distrusted, and assaulted nearly three million of its own people move towards a just and peaceful future? I fear that it will not. Without doing this, the island’s Tamils will continue to flee Sri Lanka and those left will become increasingly marginalized. This may or may not result in renewed violence on the part of Tamils against the Sri Lankan state. Either way, the future for the country’s Tamil population looks bleak unless the Sri Lankan government is pushed to rebuild their war-torn country in a manner that includes those who once rejected its legitimacy.









Its hard for the Tamils to reconcile so easily James. The Sri Lankan army has used very brutal tactics during the course of the war to defeat the rebels and didn’t discriminate between the fighters and the civilians. Thousands of civilians lost their lives in aerial and artillery bombardment. My friend whose family lives in one of the so-called ’safe-zone’ says things are very horrible there. The majority Sinhalas celebrated victory on the streets of Colombo while many Tamil civilians were breathing their last in many safe zones. A very ill-decision to celebrate victory…
It looks like the Supreme Commander of the Tamil force, Velupillai Prabhakaran, has been confirmed dead. I love how Reuters/AP is a couple days behind Demockracy on this.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090524/ap_on_re_as/as_sri_lanka_immortal_rebel
By the way, this Reuters/AP piece is seems pretty biased as well. The first sentence basically calls the Tamil’s terrorists. I guess the old saying about the thin line between terrorists and freedom fighters holds true here.
James, considering how sensitive this matter is, you did a good job of presenting this in a fairly neutral matter. The hard part always seems to be what to do now, now that the war is over. War is a whole sexier than nation building and reconciliation.
Moign, I agree that Tamils in Sri Lanka are in a very difficult position now. They have been horribly treated by the Sinhala-majority government during the war and before, and the government ‘victory’ may only make the government think that they are justified in treating Tamils however they care to. Sri Lankan President Rajapaksa’s recent rejection of war crimes investigations is another disheartening step. Both sides surely committed war crimes during the fighting. For Rajapaksa to suggest otherwise leads me to believe that he will be unlikely to tolerate criticism of his government, and will probably not feel any compulsion to treat Tamils fairly. It is heartening to see that the UN is so involved in what’s going on now though. Hopefully this will continue.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/22/AR2009052202336.html
And thanks Kevin.