John McCain, meet John McCain
by Mark Wilson, Editor
September 4, 2008
John McCain’s claims to be more in touch with the average American than Barack Obama dissolved into a pool of goo earlier this week. In an interview with The Washington Post’s Politico blog, McCain couldn’t remember how many houses he owned. Barack Obama seized on this in a speech and in an advertisement produced within 48 hours of McCain’s gaffe. Newly-unfurled vice presidential candidate Joe Biden wasted no time in similarly lambasting McCain. The seven houses incident is merely one more example of how John McCain is not the person he claims to be.
The media, thankfully, have abandoned the “maverick” narrative that has been attached to McCain since the 1990s. Back then, he may have been a “maverick” compared to the rest of the Republican party: he didn’t care that much for religion, for example. The “maverick” McCain of 2000 has morphed over the last eight years into a Republican-nomination-getting machine. McCain’s lust for the presidency is so gratuitous that he has all but forgotten what George W. Bush did to him in South Carolina in 2000. Back then, “someone” started rumors there that McCain had fathered a black baby (in fact, McCain and his wife adopted a baby from Bangladesh). McCain got over Karl Rove’s dirty tricks, as his mania for the presidency overpowered his sense of moral outrage: the Republican Party is a closed system, and to be nominated, McCain had to do its bidding.
Well into 2008, the media were still reporting that McCain was a “maverick” even though it was painfully obvious by then that McCain was modifying his beliefs in order to pander to particular groups. The old McCain had mysteriously morphed into an evangelical Christian, referring to himself as a Baptist (an evangelical branch of Protestantism) instead of Episcopalian, which is what he really is, according to him. Well, sometimes according to him. McCain is such a maverick that Congressional Quarterly reported that McCain voted with George W. Bush 95% of the time in 2007 and 100% of the time in 2008, as of June. He now claims that he supports the troops, even though he voted against new GI Bill-style legislation because he claimed it would encourage young people not to make a career out of the military.
Now we have a McCain campaign that employs sixty former telecom industry lobbyists, among other lobbyists. Here we have a Mccain who, despite enduring five years of torture in the Hanoi Hilton, voted against a bill that would prohibit the CIA from using interrogation methods prohibited by the Army Field Manual. As Andrew Sullivan points out, Bush’s use of and referral to “enhanced interrogation techniques” mean that, by the GOP’s definition of the word, John McCain wasn’t tortured.
McCain last week repeated an apocryphal story of religion on the part of his captors in Vietnam, even though the story has changed over the years. It may have even been taken from Solzhenitsen.
Whatever “straight talk” used to exist has since evaporated, as McCain has refused to acknowledge reality. The closest he has come to understanding the world around him was in January, when he told supporters in Michigan, “Some of the jobs that have left the state of Michigan are not coming back.” At the time, I found such a statement to be delightfully refreshing. Mitt Romney was, at the same time, insisting that he could bring jobs back to Michigan. (The reality, of course, is that the lost auto jobs are not coming back — at least, not unless NAFTA is repealed, tariffs are raised, and the United States experiences a resurgence in demand for inefficient cars.)
But we haven’t heard that straight talk since January. In 2007, McCain visited Baghdad and pronounced everything hunky-dory, even as two vests filled with explosives made it into the so-called Green Zone, the most secure place in the entire country. McCain entered the world of crooked talk last month in his advertisement comparing Barack Obama to Paris Hilton. The point of the ad was that Obama is as fawned over by international politicians as Paris Hilton is fawned over by celebrity-watchers, and that by virtue of the fact that they both have the same degree of fandom, Obama is as unqualified to be president as Paris Hilton is. The argument didn’t hold water and everyone roundly made fun of it.
Who is John McCain? It’s hard to say. According to him, he is a maverick politician who is in touch with the average American. According to every other piece of evidence, he is a pandering politician who is out of touch with the average American. He barely understands the Internet. He changes his mind — and even his religion — when it’s convenient. He left the Straight Talk Express abandoned by the highway eight years ago.







It’s always fun to see how politicians invariably change positions over the course of an election cycle; but it’s good to keep in mind that statistics –voting with Bush 95-100% of the time being the prime example– don’t hold up at all. Last time I checked, the President doesn’t have a vote in either house of Congress. He may have influence in some votes, but even that’s a potentially specious argument: remember that most members of the Republican Party are trying to distance themselves what’s shaping up to be a pivotal election.
I appreciate the view of the author, and the time they took to construct their commentary, but it still fails to suggest concrete reasons why one candidate’s policy is better than the others.
While it’s obviously true that George W. Bush does not have a voice in Congress, he does have an opinion on legislation. And, according to Congressional Quarterly, that opinion was the same as McCain’s opinion 95% of the time in 2007 and 100% of the time in 2008, as of June. These numbers call into question McCain’s status as a “maverick,” a label that has been applied to him repeatedly over the years and especially over the last week. Even Bush, speaking via tape at the RNC, suggested that McCain was a thorn in his side, though the reality shows that McCain actually agrees with Bush far more often than he disagrees. For a man trying to distance himself from Bush, trying to insist that he can change things, it’s quite damning to discover that his assertions are false. This isn’t a policy issue; it’s a personality issue.
[...] John McCain made a highly political choice in both 2001 and in 2004 when he decided not to switch parties and later snubbed John Kerry (his war buddy) only to embrace the man responsible for his demise at the 2004 RNC. McCain quickly began to realize his 2008 presidential aspirations when in 2006 he embraced one-time “agent of intolerance” Jerry Falwell at Liberty University (as if that’s not an oxymoron), thus consolidating his one time meager support among evangelical Christians. What followed these acts is spelled out further here by Mark Wilson. [...]