Error: Unable to create directory /home/demockra/public_html/wp-content/uploads/2010/09. Is its parent directory writable by the server? Car Trouble? Let’s Bail

by Scott Spjut, Writer
December 12, 2008

With the struggling auto industry predicting its own demise, there has been resistance by some Republicans on Capitol Hill to bail them out. And for those of us who haven’t been comatose the past eight years, we may have a knee-jerk reaction to disagree with anything Republican. So we may think bailing them out is a good idea. But let us not be so quick to judge a policy by its opposition.

“It’s insanity,” said Libertarian Party spokesperson Andrew Davis in a newsletter released Wednesday. “It’s insane that we keep going back to the taxpayers to bailout struggling corporations who, for lack of good management and sound business practices, have become unprofitable. Who in Congress is standing up for the taxpayers?”

When talks began a month ago about bailing out the struggling auto industry, I initially felt a little better about bailing them out than, say, bailing out the financial industry. In my mind, both the financial industry and the auto industry were greedy and stupid. All they wanted was more money, and they didn’t care about any negative repercussions of getting a lot of it.  However, also in my mind was the feeling that while the financial industry was mostly greedy with a good helping of stupid, the auto industry was mostly stupid with a good helping of greedy–and for some reason, I was more sympathetic to the mostly stupid.

Should we really bail out the people who are responsible for this?

Should we really bail out the people who are responsible for this?

Like many individuals, the auto industry had the mindset–sometimes referred to as path dependency–that if it has worked in the past, why wouldn’t it keep working? So, they kept building bigger cars that got fewer miles per gallon. Then, when gas prices skyrocketed, people started buying smaller, more fuel-efficient cars. This left American automakers–who had been building half-ton trucks and wide-load Hummers–with lots full of beasts they couldn’t sell.

Production went down, sales went down, and now they’re nigh unto hopeless. Some may want to blame the American people–who wanted these gas-guzzling mammoths, especially when gas was so cheap–and say that auto makers were going where the market was. Perhaps if things had stayed where they were–with gas prices and demand and such–they would have kept doing well. But when it comes down to it, automakers were being ignorant to the reality of the situation–that people would eventually want cars that ran on alternative fuels. A lack of long-term strategic thinking left the industry too vulnerable to sudden shocks in demand.

So what Detroit needs more than billions of dollars in bailout cash is some good leadership. As has been mentioned by others, the big three automakers need a complete restructuring–not an influx of money. All of the CEOs with their private jets and their fancy suits need to be standing in the unemployment line while new, fresh, smart leaders take the reigns to save the industry.

A government bailout–the very kind these aforementioned Republicans are resisting–doesn’t allow for that to happen and undermines the principles of the American free market economy. You see, the idea of capitalism and free market-ism is that the general population should run the economy. They decide what they want to buy and whom they want to buy it from. Those organizations that make mistakes, sell bad products, or poison their customer will soon be out of business; while those individuals who make bad choices with their money–or lack of money–will soon be begging on the streets.  Every so often, in order to grow in the long run, the market must flush out its waste water. People need to suffer the consequences of their bad decisions or they’ll never learn to do it differently the next time.

Should we add bankrupcy to this list?

Should we add bankruptcy to this list?

But bailouts turn the government into some sort of indulgent parent: “Oh you don’t have money for that? Here let Mom and Dad pay for it. Just promise to pay us back.” And as we all know, when someone has tons of bills to pay, the last people on the list to pay back are always the parents. Just like the $700 billion bailout of the financial industry, an auto industry bailout is not letting capitalism happen. When the government steps in instead of letting the greedy go bankrupt and the stupid go further into debt, that’s not capitalism.

There’s a natural ebb and flow of the economy (this time it’s, admittedly, a large ebb and/or flow). But let people learn from others’ mistakes. Let us be able to look back on this 20 years from now and realize what went wrong and the negative consequences of those actions. Without letting these companies fail, we will create moral hazard. In other words, there will be no incentive in the future to perform better , because, no worries, the government will just bail you out!

But even if the auto bailout does pass, let’s hope that’s the first step and not the last. Money doesn’t solve everything. The only way the money will do any good is if real, radical change takes place from top to bottom. There needs to be an industry-wide shakeup, and new leadership needs to step in, step up, or step out. There needs to be accountability.

Related Articles:

Comments

5 Responses to “Car Trouble? Let’s Bail”

  1. Jason Elder on December 12th, 2008 2:34 am

    Excellent Blog. I’ve been reading along and just wanted to say hi. I will be reading more of your posts in the future.

    - Jason.

  2. Car Trouble? Let’s Bail « How Do You Say That? on December 12th, 2008 12:14 pm

    [...] Car Trouble? Let’s Bail Jump to Comments I’ve just begun writing for a new Web site – Demockracy.com. You can read my latest article HERE. [...]

  3. Bill Melater on December 12th, 2008 12:26 pm

    So why do you hate America? Why do you desire a depression? This goes beyond idealogy. It delves into the heart and soul of America and you are killing her and us. No one, not you or me, the red states nor the blue states, will win if these companies collapse. This country, and the world, may well fall so deep and hard into depression that it will never recover. I hope you are proud of yourself.

  4. Scott on December 13th, 2008 11:44 am

    Bill,
    Thank you for your calm, well-thought-out, not-at-all-accusatory, intelligent response.

    You bring up a very good point; it’s possible that the American tradition of the auto industry may be so intertwined in the veins of America that its downfall will spell the whole country’s.

    I don’t think anyone really knows for sure what will happen (I know I don’t; journalists aren’t given a standard-issue crystal ball). I hope that if they do get the bailout, it will be the first step in a litany of changes. Even though they are steeped in American tradition, their traditions aren’t perfect.

    And if they don’t get the bailout, I hope either A) that’s incentive enough to make the necessary drastic changes, or B) they go out of business to give way to new (hopefully American) companies that will fill the niche.

    And so you know: I don’t hate America, and I don’t hate you.

  5. Andy Juell on December 19th, 2008 12:39 am

    Scott;

    Heavy industry left this country in the 1970’s primarily because they could not compete in that market and for the same reasons: Top-heavy management, unreasonable union contracts and a sort of nationalized arrogance left over from World War II. Other providers did the same job, did it cheaper and in most cases better. Democrats want to save these companies for all the wrong reasons — they represent a huge voting bloc. The Republicans view them as expendable. They would rather focus on the financial institutions. Hell, that’s just good business. They’ll be back at the fund raisers no matter what and the failure of the auto industry will be a ‘Democratic problem.’

    Best overall solution? Send GM to bankruptcy court. They won’t be able pick a color for the bathrooms in five year, much less build a decent car.. With the union contracts broken, see if any part is viable and dismantle the rest. Some divisions might be useful to Chrysler. Leave Ford alone, but with the option of some loan guarantees. They show signs of intelligence. Sell Volvo, Saab, Jaguar and Land Rover to their previous owners. Or maybe manufacture them in Zimbabwe. Those people really need something to occupy their time. Finally, get over this God-awful anghst about American tradition. I almost cried when Massey-Ferguson stopped building tractors. Well, I bought a Kubota. You know what? The corn didn’t give a shit. We move on with what works.

    Andy Juell

Join the conversation - leave a comment: