A Lesson From Canada
by Kevin Van Dyke, Editor
October 24, 2008
An Economist.com article entitled The Conservatives by a bigger head notes that a fragmented Canada gave Stephen Harper another term as Conservative Prime Minister when his party won the October 2008 federal election, achieving a bit more strength in a minority government. While the Conservatives increased their share of the popular vote by little more than a percentage point to 37.6%, this will likely only be translated into about 19 more seats.
Harper and the Conservatives did solidify their western base of Alberta oilmen and Saskatchewan farmers, and picked up seats in suburban Ontario and the Maritime provinces. However, Harper failed to increase his party’s ten seats in Quebec. For the most part in Quebec, the separatist Bloc Québécois blocked any Conservative advance, even though independence never surfaced as an issue during the campaign.
However, more than the Conservatives failing to get a majority, the main lesson to come out of the Canadian election is that Liberals were the ones that really lost it. Their share of the popular vote fell to 26%, their lowest since 1867. The Liberal leader, Stéphane Dion, a Quebecker, chose to fight the election on a bold plan for a carbon tax just when voters began to worry about the economy. (It didn’t help that Dion is not a good communicator in English.)
A broader lesson from the Canadian election is that a candidate should not impose a tax on all citizens, particularly on the middle class, when the economy is slowing. This is a lesson the McCain campaign has ignored with its proposed tax on employees for the value of employer-paid health care benefits. This tax has been one of Obama’s most effective campaign attacks and the focus of his prime literature drops over the past few weeks.









Wrong lesson.
The lesson is that being a party with a reputation for being a pack of crooks is unpopular. The Liberals in Canada had an endless series of very public criminality and corruption scandals over the last several years. The Tories have managed to have substantially fewer. At least fewer which made the papers.
Attributing the Liberals’ loss to the carbon tax is inane; the NDP, Bloc, and Greens support carbon taxes and all did much better.
Are the NDP, Bloc, or Greens in control? Their push for the tax certainly couldn’t have helped the Liberals.
Good point about the lesser of two evils on the corruption front though.
Do you think that Dion’s inability to communicate well in English played any part in the magnitude of the defeat?